A brawl involving foreign nationals broke out late Saturday night at a park in Pyeongtaek, and police arrested two men in their 20s at the scene. The two men, one Russian and the other a Kyrgyz national, were found in preliminary inquiries to be in South Korea on student visas. They suffered fractures and were hospitalized.

Police believe at least 10 foreign nationals were involved in the fight and are tracking down the remaining suspects. The two arrested men said they were assaulted without provoking anyone.

Background and context

The Pyeongtaek Police Station (평택경찰서) said it received a report at around 11:30 p.m. Saturday that foreign nationals were fighting. Video filmed by a member of a nearby volunteer neighborhood patrol shows several people surrounding a crouching man and kicking or hitting him with clubs. Members of the patrol blew whistles and dispersed the group, but the people reportedly gathered again at another location and continued fighting.

Seol-hee Kim, a member of the volunteer neighborhood patrol, said there were metal and wooden clubs at the scene, as well as broken wooden clubs scattered around. Police arrested the two men on suspicion of violating the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Violence, etc. (폭력행위 등 처벌에 관한 법률). Other people involved reportedly left the scene in vehicles.

A key point in this case is that the arrests alone do not establish who did what. Police still need to determine each person’s actions and the circumstances of the incident by reviewing video from the scene, recovered items and the accounts of those involved.

What this news means

The extent of the injuries and the determination of charges are separate issues. According to a legal guide, an injury is damage to bodily function or health, but the fact that someone suffered a fracture or was hospitalized does not by itself automatically establish a specific offense or the severity of the injury. The specific facts of the case, including the course of treatment and the causal link between the conduct and the injuries, must be established.

Nor can it be assumed that everyone involved will face the same charges simply because clubs were found at the scene. Whether an object is dangerous is assessed not only by what it is called, but also by how it was actually used and the circumstances at the time. Whether the offense was committed jointly may also depend on specific circumstances, including whether there was an intent to carry out the offense together. Reports that police arrested the two men on suspicion of violating the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Violence, etc. describe the current stage of the investigation; they do not mean that guilt has been established.

For example, even if someone at the scene was holding a club, the legal assessment may differ depending on what that person actually did and whether they took part in the fight. Conversely, the claim that someone was attacked first must be considered in light of whether the unlawful attack was still underway and whether the response was proportionate. It is therefore difficult to determine whether an act was self-defense based on a statement alone.

Relevant systems and support information

Reports said the two men were in South Korea on student visas, but did not confirm the specific visa category. It therefore cannot be assumed that both held Study (D-2) status. The Ministry of Justice’s (법무부) visa guidance describes D-2 status as permission to stay for enrollment in a regular course at an eligible educational institution or to conduct specific research. If that category applies, applicants must check the separate requirements and procedures for extending their period of stay or working part time.

Applications to extend a D-2 period of stay are made to the immigration office with jurisdiction over the applicant’s place of residence. Guidance materials list documents proving academic progress, such as enrollment, grades and attendance, as well as documents proving financial capacity and place of residence. The guidance says that people must check the conditions for part-time work and obtain permission before starting; if the employer or workplace changes, they must obtain new permission. However, the available materials and reports do not establish what effect the investigation or injuries in this case may have on the men’s immigration status.

According to legal guidance, self-defense is assessed by considering whether there was a reason to defend against an ongoing unlawful attack and whether the response was reasonable. Self-defense may be difficult to establish if people fought with the intent to attack each other, but the actual conduct and circumstances of the people involved in this case have not been confirmed. Whether clubs with nails driven into them constitute dangerous objects, and who possessed them and for what purpose, must also be assessed based on the specific circumstances of their use and the evidence.

Differences between reports

Reports differ on when the incident was reported and police responded. One report said police received a report of a fight at around 11:30 p.m. Another said an initial report came in at around 11:10 p.m. that several vehicles had gathered and a fight appeared imminent, and that Code Zero, the highest-level response, was issued about 30 minutes later after a report that foreign nationals had gathered. The reports therefore do not agree on whether there was one report or whether the situation unfolded over two separate reports.

Estimates of the number of participants also differ. One report said police believed at least 10 people were involved, while another said police estimated that about 15 people participated based on nearby CCTV footage. The possibility that the incident stemmed from a dispute between groups from Central Asia has been raised, but this was a police estimate reported elsewhere and cannot be treated as a confirmed cause.

What is confirmed and what remains unknown

Confirmed facts

  • Police said a brawl involving foreign nationals broke out late Saturday night at a park in Pyeongtaek.
  • Two men in their 20s, one Russian and the other a Kyrgyz national, were arrested. Preliminary inquiries found that the two were in South Korea on student visas.
  • The two men suffered fractures and were hospitalized. They told police they were assaulted without provocation.
  • Police found clubs and other items at the scene and in the two men’s vehicle, and are tracking down the remaining suspects.

What remains unknown

  • The total number of people who actually took part in the fight and the identities of suspects who have not yet been apprehended
  • The reason for the fight and the relationships between those involved
  • What charges will ultimately be brought against the two arrested men and the other suspects, and how the investigation and any trial will proceed
  • What actions caused the injuries, and how the accounts of those involved and the video and physical evidence will be assessed

What readers should check

  • If further reports emerge, readers should distinguish between newly confirmed information about the time the incident was reported and the estimated number of participants, and estimates that differ from earlier reports.
  • When checking information about student visas, readers should not treat the general reference to a student visa in news reports as equivalent to a specific status such as D-2. They should check the requirements for their own status, including those for extensions and work permits.
  • Whether an incident constitutes assault or injury, or whether an act was self-defense, is difficult to determine based on the fact of an injury alone or one party’s account. Readers should distinguish established facts—such as video, how an object was used and statements—from charges at the investigation stage.

References